Quadratic Inequalities
Where a parabola sits above or below the axis.
The explanation
To solve x² − x − 6 > 0:
1. Find the zeros: factor to (x − 3)(x + 2) = 0, giving x = 3 and x = −2.
2. Those split the number line into three intervals.
3. Test one value from each: x = −3 gives 6 > 0 ✓; x = 0 gives −6 > 0 ✗; x = 4 gives 6 > 0 ✓.
4. Keep the intervals that worked.
Answer: x < −2 or x > 3.
Thinking graphically is faster once it clicks. The parabola opens up and crosses at −2 and 3, so it is above the axis outside the roots and below between them. "Greater than zero" means above the axis.
The solution set of ax² + bx + c > 0 is determined by the sign of the quadratic, which can only change at its real zeros. Those zeros partition ℝ into intervals of constant sign, so one test point per interval settles the whole interval.
For a > 0 with distinct real roots r₁ < r₂: the expression is positive on (−∞, r₁) ∪ (r₂, ∞) and negative on (r₁, r₂). For a < 0 the pattern inverts. Endpoints are included for ≥ and ≤ and excluded for strict inequalities.
Degenerate cases follow the discriminant. With Δ < 0 the expression never changes sign, so x² + 1 > 0 has solution ℝ while x² + 1 < 0 has none. With Δ = 0 the single root is the only place the expression is zero, so (x − 2)² > 0 excludes just that point.
The same sign-analysis method extends unchanged to higher-degree polynomial and to rational inequalities, where the partition points are the zeros of the numerator together with the zeros of the denominator.
Worked example
Solve 2x² + 5x − 3 ≤ 0.
- Factor: (2x − 1)(x + 3) = 0, so roots x = 1/2 and x = −3.
- a > 0, so the parabola opens up and is negative between the roots.
- ≤ includes the endpoints.
Answer: −3 ≤ x ≤ 1/2, or [−3, 1/2]
Common mistakes
- Solving as if it were an equation and reporting only the two roots.
- Keeping the interval between the roots for a 'greater than' problem with a > 0.